> Yeah, yeah, laugh all you want. Phonetically, Sagittarius (which is
> what the "saj" depicts) IS "SAJ" and it looks a lot better than "SAG"
> which is correct for the spelling.

Yeah, I know, and I know that's probably why you changed it to saj,
and I'm sure that's why Sierra Sally accidently put sag. I just never
saw it that way, and it struck a funny bone of mine! =)

> Hey, I'm 50 and am entitled to a little sagging these days anyway!

Boy, if I was twice my age, Old Blue would have something to worry
about. I didn't notice a single sag! ;o)

Okay.... another topic....


> is it okay to scan and post the microbox visitor logs on our
> website?

I'd definitely have to urge you *not* to do this. There are some
people who'd rather not have their stamp image online, and unless you
get permission from the people that logged in, I wouldn't recommend it.

The letterboxing.org FAQ even has this to say: "Don't publish or
re-transmit other peoples' clues or stamp images without their
permission."

However, if you put a disclaimer in your clues telling people that by
stamping into the box they are giving consent to have their entry
scanned in and displayed on your website, I don't think it would be an
issue.

If you just want to provide a list of everyone who logged in--without
the scanned images, just a list of names and perhaps the date it was
found--I doubt anyone would be too upset with that either.


In other news..... Rumor has it that Lemony Snicket won't come out of
hiding if Bush wins the election. Not sure if it's true or not, but I
can't say I blame him. ;o)

-- Ryan